|
The first secretary of the Congress Board for Sumar-En Comú Podem, Gerardo Pisarello, has maintained that "in order for there to be normalized use of languages, there must be simultaneous translation" in the plenary sessions of the Lower House. In an interview this Friday on Catalunya Ràdio, he maintained that the next plenary session of Congress will not meet "the full conditions for there to be normalized use" which, in his opinion, require resources, but are not impossible. He has proposed prior translation and self-translation as "intermediate solutions" if there is a will, textually, to send a message to the international community of the recognition of linguistic plurality by the Lower House.
by Taboola Sponsored links you may like Unsold Prefabricated Cabins Sell For Almost Nothing! (Take A Look) Unsold Prefabricated Cabins He has also aimed to "make the possibility of listening to languages in Congress more flexible Email Data through a Presidency resolution" until approving a reform that, according to his party, should be ambitious. "We are facing a change that should be evident, but it is a profound change and it is very important to do it legally in a solid way," said Pisarello, who has reiterated that negotiations are being carried out with the groups to ensure their legal coverage. Regarding the statements of the former president of the Generalitat Carles Puigdemont, who denied that there were negotiations for the investiture of the acting president and candidate of the PSOE, Pedro Sánchez, Pisarello has assured that "dialogue is dialogue."
He has stated that he sees "no argument" for a repeat election to be a good thing for any party and has maintained that everyone, literally, will exercise political responsibility. Regarding the proposal of the Basque Lehendakari, Íñigo Urkullu, to hold a constitutional convention to reinterpret the Constitution in territorial matters, he has urged an agreement that no "totally regressive interpretations be made in the area of plurinationality." Carrillo, Anguita, the unions, or the militants of revolutionary and/or transformative organizations were asked to be responsible, which had the consequence that some entered and accepted the consensus and others did not do so. The former deputy regrets that the diatribe is bipartisan or Vox and assures that "this is also how the prevailing framework that had operated until .
|
|